Using writing to get lucid

I’ll try for a couple of days. Is it recommended to do it on paper or a computer? I think I’ll experiment with that a little.

I don’t think there’s a bigger difference between analog and digital writing. You could always do a little of both. Or as you say, experiment to find what fits you best.

I’ll try this tonight! :smile:

I just saw

Write a line and then a reality check,
but how can you fall asleep just in 1 second!
???

How can it be possible :confused:

Another question,
If I use this method do I have to do anything else to get Lucid?

I’ll try this one last time tonight…

How long did it take for you to get success with this technique, KragonV?

Heh, having the ability to perform a reality check doesn’t mean that you’re slumbering. It just means that you’re performing some sort of action that will ‘succeed’ if you are truly visuallizing reality(‘in’ reality) at that instant or otherwise result in something ‘unnatural’ occuring.

Computer writing should work, so long as you don’t ctrl-c the sentence over and over again. :tongue:

I don’t think this method ever worked for me, but it won’t hurt if I do it again tonight.

I think this will work. Ima try this out, but not 50 lines. Maybe 10 good intent lines.

I actually did this just last week during the spare time after my chem test. I had a lucid the day after. so I don’t know if it’s coincidence, or if it truly did work. I should (and will) try it more.

I tried this for a few nights, had no luck though, It would
probably work for some people though.
:smile:

seems to me that in writing long-hand, you are more connected with the thought because you are actually taking the time to draw the language corresponding with the thought out on a piece of paper. your mind and body need to be in sync to do that, so it seems like a better method than writing it on a computer, where all of the letters are just little squares that you press. Have done some research regarding how writing something long-hand makes for more connection to the content of what you are writing.
that said, I am going to try this myself…

Last night I wrote down “I will have a lucid dream tonight.” on a piece of notebook paper 25 times. I didn’t want to do 50 lines because I just got overwhelmed and it was already 22:30, which is the time I wanted to go to bed. To make matters worse, I didn’t remember anything when I woke up the following morning. Although, after that I did read for about an hour and watched some clips of a movie until 23:45.

tried it.

nothing happened.
screw it.
i’m trying WBTB tonight.

Well, any LD technique probably doesn’t work first time, so why not try it tonight and use WBTB (at least, that’s what I’ll do).

I tried this but only got a ND :meh:
I typed on the computer 50 times, and wrote on paper 50 times :wink:

This can work but I think it’s very important that you can LET GO after you did it. If you keep thinking you must have a LD that night, it will not work because your mind become stressy of it…

Just write, let go and be meditative before you go to sleep. :smile:

I actually keep my DJ and a regular journal in the same book (I begin each day by writing down my dreams, then I write the normal journal entry). I think I could start writing “I will have a lucid dream tonight” at the end of each entry before I go to bed, 'cause I wrote in my journal before I went to sleep last night and I actually did dream about the things I wrote… Unfortunately >.>

I think I’m going to try this, I just have to remember to write it before going to bed.

I think this can work, the first LD I got was with WBTB and when I was awake I wrote everything I could remember about Lucid Dreaming and then when I got to bed again after 30 mins I got 2 LDs.

I think writing is better than saying because then maybe your brain is more active, I might even try and write with the wrong hand.

I’ll report back in three days with how it goes for me

I hope I won’t get to bored with writing “I will have a lucid dream tonight” 50 times per day.

But I think it’s worth a try :content: