Oh haha, this outta be fun.
I’ve read all the Eragon books (so far) and all the harry potter books.
But I think I like the Eragon books better, though.
I think i could try this. I don’t know any words in the “Ancient language” so I would have to try it harry-potter style.
I didn’t really say anything, but my plan was to make a chip bag explode.
I jush swished my arms around, but instead of it exploding, a yellow beam of light went through it and it turned to stone.
I often ask an object to do whatever I want it to. Asking a desk to disappear, for example. It seems to work, and when I try to force things to change I wake up.
When I cast spells in dreams I do them without saying the spell. I think about what I want to do and it just happens. It takes a lot of willpower though. Sometimes it doesn’t work, so I just move on to something else.
hmm i find different methods of magic more believable then others, of all the fictional styles ive read about it hink eragons would be most realistic, compared to say harry potter thus it is easier to do in ld’s. Which seems more believable
Harry Potter: some people are born with the ability to use magic, it is quite random, if you can use magic you have to have a stick with some sort of feather or hair in it, and shout magic words which cause magic lights to come flying out of your stick and influence the world.
Eragon: certain people have a talent for it, it is more random, but if the person can use magic, he is tapping into his own energy or drawing energy from nature and other living things, the energy in magic cant come from nowere so it has to come from a life form, which through the casters body, can create a force that can affect the world, also because all spells take energy, you can not do crazy things like revive the dead or transform your own appearence
i find the second one much more believable so i find it easier to do in ld’s you may find the first one more believeable however so do what works for you