VVG3 signups > after years finally a next time ;P
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 24, 25, 26  Next  :| |:
LD4all » Playground  
Who should GM VVG1?
Who should GM VVG1?
Magnus
50%
 50%  [ 33 ]
Not pasQuale
50%
 50%  [ 33 ]
Total Votes : 66


#31:  Author: Bruno PostPosted: Mon 11 Jun, 2007
    ----
My playing history: which makes for a whooping total of 9 WG & 2 VG.

I'm currently playing nothing. I intend to play VG-14 and WG-40.

Note: GMed games marked with an *, so they count double.


Last edited by Bruno on Wed 12 May, 2010; edited 4 times in total

#32:  Author: shatterspike1 PostPosted: Mon 11 Jun, 2007
    ----
Oh yes, my history.

VG-3
VG-2 (Idled out)
VG-1
WG-26
WG-25
WG-17
WG-16
WG-15

So, excluding VG-2, I have 2 VGs and five WGs.

But I think this is okay (PLZ?! shy2 )

#33:  Author: Bruno PostPosted: Mon 11 Jun, 2007
    ----
VVG one — Playing Intentions

Cleared Players

  1. Bayo
  2. Moogle
  3. pasQuale
  4. Sandra
  5. Ansie
  6. Magnus (GM)

The "Uh–Oh" List

  • TRJR: History pending.
  • Duck: History pending.
  • Petter: 2 VG to go + Idling Reputation.
  • Ferret: 1 VG to go.
  • Angstyboy: History pending.
  • Shatterspike: 1 VG to go.
  • Bruno: 3 VG to go.

Q wrote:
BTW: WG's / VG's in which you idled out (were killed due to idling) do NOT count towards the required games that are needed to be able to join VVG.

Don't worry, Spike, there's plenty of time until 13 people are actually clear to go. You'll be out of the uh–oh list sooner than you think. smile

#34:  Author: shatterspike1 PostPosted: Mon 11 Jun, 2007
    ----
Wait, why does this require both 3 VGs and 3 WGs?

It seems like that goes a bit far.

(Just my opinion.)

#35:  Author: Win Laik Pya PostPosted: Mon 11 Jun, 2007
    ----
my history

WG 25
WG 26
VG 1
VG 2-idle'd out (dunno if that counts)
VG 3

#36:  Author: Bruno PostPosted: Mon 11 Jun, 2007
    ----
VVG one — Playing Intentions

Cleared Players

  1. Bayo
  2. Moogle
  3. pasQuale
  4. Sandra
  5. Ansie
  6. Magnus (GM)

The "Uh–Oh" List

  • TRJR: 1 VG to go + 1 WG to go.
  • Duck: History pending.
  • Petter: 2 VG to go + Idling Reputation.
  • Ferret: 1 VG to go.
  • Angstyboy: History pending.
  • Shatterspike: 1 VG to go.
  • Bruno: 3 VG to go.

Spike wrote:
Wait, why does this require both 3 VGs and 3 WGs?

It seems like that goes a bit far.

(Just my opinion.)

Officially: because if one hasn't played enough of both, they'll be confused by playing the two at the same time.

I have a hunch that there's more to it. Since before I joined the forum, people have been talking about how it would be nice to have a game played only by "experienced" players, who wouldn't just drop by every day to post their votes, and instead really dive into the game. Well, I think someone's using VVG as the opportunity for that round to finally happen.

Think about it for a second: every time V/WG is played, there's someone to spoil it. But sure, we've got to respect that, they're playing a different way, they're being strategical or something. Now think about VVG. That game is going to be one massive "God save us all" situation, if you know what I mean. If people go play it just for the sake of curiosity, with all the intention of not doing more than just voting every day, it will be a major failure. VVG was designed in a way it can only be fun if you really dive into it, get into the roleplay, take your time to analyse other players' behaviour and lay out strategies... It was made to be played by experienced players!

The thing is, there aren't enough experienced players (especially when it comes to VG) yet. That's not a problem. We can wait. This game will, apparently, only be played in a good while from now. But regardless of that, anyone who has the intention of playing it should stay tuned in this topic, help set up the rule system and go play the pending games to be clear. I think that's the big idea here. What do you think?

#37:  Author: Sandra PostPosted: Mon 11 Jun, 2007
    ----
I love it that I'm on the cleared players list lach2 grin

#38:  Author: Vermath PostPosted: Mon 11 Jun, 2007
    ----
Holy Shit that is the most confusing shit i have ever seen in my entire life.

I'm fairly certain that this will degrade into all the villagers are dead and the vampires and wolves duke it out.
Like i said you can't spell slaughter without laughter.

Dibbs. Though i have yet to do a WG i have done 3 VG's

(Dibbs=let me in PWEASE!)

#39:  Author: Slinking_Ferret PostPosted: Mon 11 Jun, 2007
    ----
Ok, I need another WG not VG

And I think I also suggested that to moogle, we were talking about what defines experienced.

#40:  Author: Wulf PostPosted: Mon 11 Jun, 2007
    ----
*Wulf needs to play WG28 first, but will signup then grin

*Wulf only played 3 VG's, and 2WG's sadblauw

#41:  Author: Bruno PostPosted: Mon 11 Jun, 2007
    ----
VVG one — Playing Intentions

Cleared Players

  1. Bayo
  2. Moogle
  3. pasQuale
  4. Sandra
  5. Ansie
  6. Magnus (GM)

The "Uh–Oh" List

  • TRJR: 1 VG to go + 1 WG to go.
  • Duck: History pending.
  • Petter: 2 VG to go + Idling Reputation.
  • Ferret: 1 WG to go.
  • Angstyboy: History pending.
  • Shatterspike: 1 VG to go.
  • Bruno: 3 VG to go.
  • Vermath: History pending.
  • Sanoma: History pending + 1 WG to go.

Sandra: of course you are, GMing a game counts as playing two!

Vermath, Sanoma, please post your playing histories. wink5 Vermath, I didn't understand if you meant you haven't played any WGs or if you're only one WG away from clearing. lachtraan

#42:  Author: Qu PostPosted: Tue 12 Jun, 2007
    ----
@shatter, you kind of idled in VG3 too if you hadn't been voted out second round you may have idled.. you said so yourself

that's why we ask for history, if you play 3 WG's but in all 3 you have barely survived night 1 or day 2 then you are still not very experienced.

to play VVG you just have to have a total understanding about how WG and VG works, that's why we said 3 WGs and 3 VG's.
GM counts double since you have been in the game for the whole game and well you GMed it so you obviously know the rules.

as for strategies and such, i don't know if that will really work in VVG :D it will be fun to find out. For me the focus comes more into rp now.

So experiended, in my opinion, means that you know how WG and VG work. And for VG, the rules still change for that since we haven't really finalized them.

kiekeboe also: what do you mean 11 votes for 'not pasQuale'

#43:  Author: Duck PostPosted: Tue 12 Jun, 2007
    ----
Two WGs and Two VG's here. I idled once in WG, If I remember correctly. But, I wasn't threw out, there was rule of idling twice.

#44:  Author: Bruno PostPosted: Wed 13 Jun, 2007
    ----
VVG one — Playing Intentions

Cleared Players

  1. Bayo
  2. Moogle
  3. pasQuale
  4. Sandra
  5. Ansie
  6. Magnus (GM)

The "Uh–Oh" List

  • TRJR: 1 VG to go + 1 WG to go.
  • Duck: 1 VG to go + 1 WG to go.
  • Petter: 2 VG to go + Idling Reputation.
  • Ferret: 1 WG to go.
  • Angstyboy: History pending.
  • Shatterspike: 1 VG to go.
  • Bruno: 3 VG to go.
  • Vermath: History pending.
  • Sanoma: History pending + 1 WG to go.

#45:  Author: Wulf PostPosted: Wed 13 Jun, 2007
    ----
Quote:
Vermath, Sanoma, please post your playing histories.


Wolfgame 26 - Player Stats


11.Sanoma dead seer

_____________________________________________________ _______

(VG1) GM= Magnus

19. Sanoma - Sanoma the Forest Elf

_____________________________________________________ _______

Vampire Game 2 ~ GM Quuipo

Sanoma - Sanoma the Forest Elf DEAD 2ND VAMPIRE


_____________________________________________________ _______

Wolfgame 27 - GM: BaYoNeTTe


Sanoma the forest Elf Sanoma dead villager

_____________________________________________________ _______

Vampire Game 3 - GM: Siiw

Sanoma

_____________________________________________________ _______

Is this what you wanted?



LD4all » Playground


Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 24, 25, 26  Next  :| |:
Page 3 of 26
printed from the LD4all.com lucid dreaming forum. Content copyrighted by the author.
Lucid dreamers unite! visit LD4all.com